Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eden Silva vs Nina Vargova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silva vs Vargova analysis and find out who is favored!
Eden Silva vs Nina Vargova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Silva 1 - 0 Vargova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silva has won 42.17% of points on their second serve, while Vargova has won 53.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silva, in recent form, has won 52.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vargova has won 56.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.97% and 43.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silva has saved 57.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vargova has saved 54.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silva has won 43.18% of matches played (W/L 19/ 25), with Vargova winning 68.35% (W/L 54/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Silva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 120/ 97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 13/ 31). Vargova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 51/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Silva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 18/ 22), where as Vargova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 36/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Silva winning 1 times and Vargova being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Silva winning 2 and Vargova winning 1. The last match between Silva and Vargova was at the W25 Bastad, 09-05-2023, First, Clay with Eden Silva getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Silva and Vargova have played a deciding set 1 times, with Silva winning 1 times and Vargova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Silva winning 0, and Vargova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.98 while Vargova has played against players with an average rank of 224.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silva has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vargova has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silva has converted 43.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vargova has converted 47.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
462
Rank
298
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
451
Rank
451
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
51% (236-229)
Career Total W/L
61% (66-42)
31% (5-11)
YTD W/L
75% (36-12)
$34,855
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eden Silva | Nina Vargova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:53:0 | 2:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (55/105) | 68% (70/103) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (28/55) | 54% (38/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (26/50) | 33% (11/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (9/17) | 44% (8/18) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (54/103) | 49% (51/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Eden Silva
Player
Nina Vargova
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eden Silva | Nina Vargova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (5/11) | 75% (36/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (16/22) | 71% (80/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (163/183) | 59% (583/398) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 76% (28/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 58 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 92 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:1 | 1:50:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 334.88 | 156.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (829/1225) | 67% (1975/2960) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (495/829) | 62% (1224/1975) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (167/396) | 53% (525/985) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (58/133) | 48% (200/417) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (470/1113) | 48% (1462/3040) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 31% (5/11) | 68% (21/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (15/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (5/15) | 75% (36/48) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 89% (8/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 53% (9/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 83% (41/34) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 17% (41/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Eden Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Eden Silva
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
1
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Eden Silva
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Min Liu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Eden Silva
55%
(
85 of
155)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
49%
(
34 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
72 of
155)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
131
Total Points Won
132
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Eden Silva
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Eden Silva
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
72%
(
84 of
116)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Eleejah Inisan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eden Silva
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carmen Corley
Player
Eden Silva
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve %
70%
(
14 of
20)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
16
Total Points Won
18
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Nina Vargova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Nina Vargova
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
23%
(
5 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Noka Juric
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Nina Vargova
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Lara Smejkal
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Samsonova
Player
Nina Vargova
61%
(
79 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
96 of
136)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
68 of
136)
137
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Panna Bartha
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Falkowska
Player
Nina Vargova
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Irina Balus
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Marie Benoit
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Julie Struplova
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
121)
117
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Silva Vs Vargova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
